Skip to main content
Log in

Two new petrified cycad stems,Brunoa gen. nov. andWorsdellia gen. nov., from the Cretaceous of Patagonia (Bajo de Santa Rosa, Río Negro Province), Argentina

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polyxylic columnar stems covered by persistent leaf bases and found in sediments assignable to the Upper Cretaceous of Bajo de Santa Rosa, Río Negro Province, Argentina, are described as two new generic entities in the Cycadales. Anatomical characters are the basis for their being assigned to the Encephalartoideae of the Zamiaceae.Brunoa santarrosensis gen. et sp. nov. is characterized by the presence of polyxyly, cone domes, mucilage cavities, and uniseriate to triseriate araucaroid, scalariform, or bordered intervascular pitting.Worsdellia bonettiae gen. et sp. nov. has polyxyly, anastomosing medullary vascular bundles, centripetal xylem, mucilage canals, and concentric extraxylary bundles. Some characters (polyxyly, medullary vascular bundles, and cone domes) were used to determine the systematic position, while other characters (mucilage reservoirs and centripetal xylem) were used to establish the relationship between polyxylic and monoxylic forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Andreis, R. 1996. The Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary around the Somuncurá Massif (northern Patagonia, Argentina): Considerations about the Los Alamitos and Allen Formations. News of the First Annual Conference of IGCP Project 381 (SAMCI), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil 5: 12–14.

  • E. Ancibor, S. Archangelsky, A. E. Artabe, J. Bonaparte &J. Genise. 1991. Asociación de vegetales y animales del Cretácico tardio del norte de la Patagonia. Ameghiniana 28(1–2): 201–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archangelsky, S. &D. Brett. 1963. Studies on Triassic fossil plants from Argentina, II.Michelilloa waltonii nov. gen. et sp. from the Ischigualasto Formation. Ann. Bot. 27: 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artabe, A. E. 2001. The fossil Cycadales of Argentina. Savitriana 1: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. W. Stevenson. 1999. Fossil Cycadales of Argentina. Bot. Rev. 65: 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • -& A. B. Zamuner. 1999. A new cycad stem from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina. Boletim do 5° Simposio o Cretáceo do Brasil, UNESP, Campus de Rio Claro/SP: 309–313.

  • Ash, S. 1985. A short thick cycad stem from the Upper Triassic of Petrified Forest National Park, Arizona and vicinity. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin 54: 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrill D. J. 2000. A petrified cycad trunk from the Late Cretaceous of the Larsen Basin, Antarctica. Alcheringa 24: 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, C. J. 1909.Dioon spinulosum. Bot. Gaz. 48: 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1911. The adult cycad trunk. Bot. Gaz. 52: 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, P. R. 1988. Major clades and relationships in “higher” gymnosperms. Pp. 218–272in C. B. Beck (ed.), Origin and evolution of gymnosperms. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorety, H. 1909. The extrafascicular cambium ofCeratozamia. Bot. Gaz. 47: 150–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. E. 1971.Lyssoxylon grigsbyi, a cycad trunk from the Upper Triassic of Arizona and New Mexico. Amer. J. Bot. 58: 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greguss, P. 1968. Xylotomy of the living cycads, with a description of their leaves and epidermis. Akademiai Kiadó, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. D., D. W. Stevenson &R. Osborne. 2004. The world list of cycads. Bot. Rev. 70(2): 274–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, K. P. 1962.Fascivarioxylon mehtae gen. et sp. nov., a new petrified cycadean wood from the Rajmahal Hills, Bihar, India. The Palaeobotanist 11: 138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. A. S. 1959. The families of cycads and the Zamiaceae of Australia. Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. W. 84: 64–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, A. & A. Crisafulli. 1998. Lenos de Cycadales de la Formación La Temera (Triásico Superior), Chile. Resümenes 7° Congreso Argentino de Paleontologia y Bioestratigrafía, Bahía Bianca: 9.

  • Mamay, S. H. 1969. Cycads—Fossil evidence of Late Paleozoic origin. Science 164 (3877): 295–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — 1976. Paleozoic origin of the cycads. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 934: 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, H., M. Nishida &K. Tanaka. 1991. Petrified plants from the Cretaceous of the Kwanto Mountains, central Japan, [II. A polyxylic cycadean trunk,Sanchucycas gigantea gen et sp. nov. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 104: 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norstog, K. &T. Nicholls. 1997. The biology of the cycads. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petriella, B. 1969.Menucoa cazaui nov. gen. et sp., tronco petrificado de Cycadales, Provincia de Rio Negro, Argentina. Ameghiniana 6(4): 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1972. Estudio de las maderas petrificadas del Terciario inferior del área central de Chubut (Cerro Bororó). Revista del Museo de La Plata (n.s.), sección Paleontología 6: 159–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &J. V. Crisci. 1975. Estudios numéricos en Cycadales, I. Cycadales actuales: Sistemática. Boletfn Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 16(3): 231–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1979. Estudios numéricos en Cycadales, II. Cycadales actuales: Simulación de érboles filogenéticos. Obra del Centenario del Museo de La Plata 3: 151–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoot, E. L., T. N. Taylor &T. Delevoryas. 1985. Structurally preserved fossil plants from Antarctica, I.Antarcticycas, gen. nov., a Triassic cycad stem from the Beardmore Glacier area. Amer. J. Bot. 72: 1410–1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, D. W.. 1988. Strobilar ontogeny in the Cycadales. Pp. 205–244in P. Leins, S. Tucker & P. Endress (eds.), Aspects of floral development. J. Cramer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1990. Morphology and systematics of the Cycadales. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 57: 8–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1992. A formal classification of the extant cycads. Brittonia 44: 220–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. N. 1969. Cycads: Fossil evidence of the Upper Pennsylvanian. Science 164: 294–295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Worsdell, W. C. 1896. The anatomy of the stem ofMacrozamia compared with that of other genera of Cycadaceae. Ann. Bot. 10(40): 601–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1901. Contributions to the comparative anatomy of the Cycadaceae. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, ser. 2(6): 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1906. The structure and origin of the Cycadaceae. Ann. Bot. 20: 129–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamuner, A. B. 1992. Estudio de una tafoflora de la localidad tipo de la Formación Ischigualasto (Netotrias), Provincia de San Juan. Tesis inédita N 483. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo de La Plata, U.N.L.P.

  • Zhu, J.-N. &Du, X.-M. 1981. A new cycadPrimocycas chilensis gen. et sp. nov. from the Lower Permian in Shanxi, China and its significance. Acta Botanica Sinica 23: 401–404.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Artabe, A.E., Zamuner, A.B. & Stevenson, D.W. Two new petrified cycad stems,Brunoa gen. nov. andWorsdellia gen. nov., from the Cretaceous of Patagonia (Bajo de Santa Rosa, Río Negro Province), Argentina. Bot. Rev 70, 121–133 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2004)070[0121:TNPCSB]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2004)070[0121:TNPCSB]2.0.CO;2

Keywords

Navigation